Iran and Its Proxy Attacks: A Discussion About How the U.S. Should Respond

TOPIC: Iran's pivotal transformation post the Iranian Revolution in 1979, its support for proxy warfare, the nuanced challenges it presents to U.S. foreign policy, and how the U.S. should respond.

WATCH:

MONEY LINE:

"The killing of the American troops is a Rubicon. You just cannot allow it to be crossed again."

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

• The Iranian Revolution marked Iran's drastic shift from a beacon of modernity in the Middle East to a regime characterized by oppression and violence.
  

• Iran's support for groups like Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas directly challenges U.S. interests and regional stability.
  

• Recent killings of U.S. military personnel have prompted action, raising questions about the adequacy of the response and public acknowledgment by the Biden administration.
  

• A decisive yet measured approach to the aggression, aimed to maintain global security and secure American interests without unnecessary escalation, is important.
  

• The Biden administration's decision-making and communication strategies highlight ongoing concerns about U.S. foreign policy direction.
  

• Biden has not confirmed that America's interests have been recaptured, refortified, and resolidified after we killed 29 rank-in-file members of the militias after they killed three U.S. military members.

• Biden does not want to let his base know that he is defending American interests for political reasons.

• Trump does not get enough credit for his diplomacy with North Korea, China, and Iran. He cut off the financial spickets and did not receive a lot of antagonism.

LISTEN: